Blog Layout

The Immovable Object Meets the Irresistible Force

By Combined Ratio Solutions August 19th, 2021



In this blog series, we set out to help you establish a formula for combining technology and people into the right ratio so you can manage your agency relationships in the face of business and technological change. We promote balance here. It’s about finding the balance between technology and people. We’ve talked about facts and fictions of digital transformation and even looked at the “looming talent cliff.” We’re going to get back to that idea of balance. We acknowledge the value of transformative technology AND the need to use that technology to help us attend to our agency relationships combined with (not in place of) our sales and marketing “know-how.”



As usual we’re dealing with competing forces. On one hand, the belief that “technology solves all,” leaving no room for the “soft” skills of relationship management and people “know-how.” The other extreme is those stuck in the past, who assign little credit to technology and who see no promise of the change it brings to our agency business. The truth lies somewhere in the middle, which is the trickier course to navigate. The main challenge is how to gather, analyze and codify those “soft” skills. 


A Battle of Wits – “The Immovable Object”


The “immovable object” represents those stalwart, skeptical views, that maintain the primacy of human relations leaving no room for the “irresistible force,” – the overwhelming onward slog of digital. What’s behind this polar opposite view?


The Immovable Object: Humans hate change. Despite all the fashionable management teachings of the last 50 years, people don’t like having their cheese moved, and most do not think that “change is good” (despite what they say in public.) Human beings may complain about it, but we like order, routine, and consistency. We’re comfortable. Human beings are not into change as it promotes the opposite and introduces uncertainty into our lives. 

For evidence of this look no further than our old friend “the Pandemic.” There are many ideas and processes that were possible before the pandemic. Ideas that had been around and available for years (like remote work), yet they had never become mainstream. Remote work was perfectly viable, at large scale, but because we hate to change it was “under-adopted.” We need a reason to change. Just because we “can” do something doesn’t mean we “do.” Until we must. Enter the pandemic and for example the number of people “working from home” skyrockets despite the fact that technically this has not only been possible, but “easy”, for years. Take a look at this article from Sep 2018 and you’ll see what we mean. “The steady rise of Americans working from home continues. According to recently released data from the US Census, 5.2% of workers in the US worked at home in 2017—or 8 million people. That share is up from 5% in 2016, and 3.3% in 2000.” Not only does this data demonstrate a low number of workers, working from home, but the rate of increase being equally slow, despite the technical convenience. The pandemic accelerated the uptake of remote working. In other words, despite all the complaining about commutes and traffic, etc., people still preferred to trudge into the office…until they couldn’t. 


This same intransigence explains the “Immovable Object” of resistance to technological change in how Carriers work with their agency partners. In other words, people will resist change where they can, despite those changes being available and some of the benefits being obvious. 


“The Irresistible Force”

The idea that the opposing forces of digital transformation and technological change represents an “irresistible force” doesn’t need much explanation. It conjures up dramatic images and phrases all concerned with “being left behind”, becoming “yesterday’s news” and “dinosaurs.” “Time waits for no man, change, or die, progress,” blah, blah, blah. Combined with the modern phenomenon of FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) and we have a heady cocktail promoting change, the opposite of which promises the sober, cold gray light of loneliness, despair and death. Dramatic stuff that partially explains the race to embrace the latest and greatest technology has to offer for fear of being left in the dust!

As the workforce generations turn over, more members of this modern work force are digital natives. They have grown up with technology and are fluent in the language and behavior of “digital.” They have changing communications preferences (for example, via text rather than phone), are comfortable trading anonymity for convenience, and think that technology answers are the only answers.

Finally, technology is generally seen as saving money. Whether it’s a destroyer of jobs or liberator of people is a deep debate we won’t get into here, but technology adoption is usually seen as serving the goals of shareholder value and earnings reports. This provides more energy to the argument that “if it’s not a technology answer, its not an answer” thinking.


“The Combined Ratio” - What This Means to You and Your Team 

It means that you need to find the right ratio – of technology and people – to continually adapt and improve how you manage your agency business. While humans love extremes (as they are simple and serve a dramatic picture) the best course is rarely at one end of the spectrum or the other. 

Here’s what we say:


  • Ensure that your people understand how you’re viewing the changing dynamics in the Agency businesses. Adopting a “business as normal” image trivializes what people have been through and supporting an idea of “nothing’s changed” is implausible meaning you’ll undermine credibility. Particularly with the digital natives that you already have, or will need.


  • By the same token it’s not “all that went before is bad” and its time “to burn it down.” It’s not that institutionalized “know-how” doesn’t have value. It does. Capturing it, analyzing it, codifying it and leveraging it is the challenge. 


  • Find the balance of healthy skepticism and practical optimism. Despite the onslaught, change usually takes longer than we think (for a bunch of reasons). The image of Digital Natives on one shore and Luddites on the other might be dramatic, but it’s a myth, so don’t get seduced into believing it. You know that sensible technology, thoughtfully deployed and carefully combined with the attributes of experience and sales and marketing “know-how” will have major effects. Carriers need to acknowledge the power and role of human relationships (the soft skills know-how) and figure out how to combine that with the technology side. Finding that ratio will make all the difference.



 



By Dmitry Zhgarev 11 Oct, 2021
B y Combined Ratio Solutions O ctober  11 th , 2021
By Combined Ratio Solutions 08 Sep, 2021
By Combined Ratio Solutions September 8th, 2021
By Dmitry Zhgarev 17 Jul, 2021
By Combined Ratio Solutions July 17th, 2021 
By Combined Ratio Solutions 15 Jun, 2021
By Combined Ratio Solutions June 11th, 2021
Finding the Right Ratio
By CRS 25 May, 2021
By Combined Ratio Solutions May 20th, 2021
By CRS 29 Jan, 2021
What Is a Combined Ratio and why is it our company name?
By CRS 26 Jan, 2021
A Closer Look at the Errors
By CRS 19 Jan, 2021
Our Thoughts on Deloitte's 2021 Insurance Outlook
By Dmitry Zhgarev 08 Nov, 2020
Combined Ratio Solutions Co-Founders Michael Jones, Chief Executive Officer and Luke Magnan, Chief Operating Officer spoke with MetroHartford Alliance Content Manager Nan Price about their experience launching an InsurTech startup and the importance of locating their business in Hartford. NAN PRICE: Give us a little context about when and why you launched the company. MIKE JONES: Luke and I had spent 20 years working in various facets of the insurance industry on the agency and carrier side. We had both segued into the technology side, where we met around 2012 when we were working on similar project at the same organization. As that company was getting acquired, we saw an opportunity for us to build our own company focusing on the insurance industry, which we had been part of our lives for so long. Honestly, we thought we knew what we were going to focus on and we started down that path. As we started to expose our vision to the marketplace, we received positive feedback but we found there was another business problem that really needed solving, where there was a big gap in offerings. So, we pivoted pretty quickly. We’ve been working on that concept for the last couple of years. Then, in January of 2018, we formally started the company. LUKE MAGNAN: Mike and I come from software companies that service the insurance industry. When we started thinking about going out on our own, we made a very conscious decision that we didn’t want to be a different type of software startup. We saw a different path forward and we decided early on that we weren’t going to walk down the investment or accelerator path. We wanted to be a profit-generating company as soon as possible. So, we started the services side of our business to do that and to fund the software side. That approach enabled us to do some things I think other startup companies aren’t able to do, like finding our office space in Hartford and hiring people in Hartford and paying them good salaries. NAN: Mike, you mentioned pivoting. Did the company experience any other pivots as a result of COVID-19? MIKE: Because of what we do as a services practice, we help insurers with a lot of their technology needs. So, we’re well equipped to operate remotely. Even pre-COVID-19, that’s how we communicated with our customers. With the pandemic, we found that our customers needed an added level of help when they were constrained by remote work and the demands that come along with managing people virtually. They’ve leaned on us a lot more because they know we have the capacity and expertise to coach them through managing their teams. So, in one respect we’re thriving through COVID-19 because of the nature of what we do for our customers. However, we have products we were planning to aggressively get out into the marketplace pre-COVID-19 and the pandemic slowed us down. It made it a harder sale. A lot of times in our industry, you can make a big splash when you announce your product and its value and benefits at big conferences and tradeshows. Well, all of that went away, so we did need to pivot our strategy there. And, while we had planned to be in the marketplace in March, the pandemic enabled us to pump the brakes a bit and be a little more introspective about where we were going to position our product and the value it would provide. NAN: We all know Hartford is “The Insurance Capital of The World.” As an InsurTech company, was that part of reason to locate in Hartford? LUKE: We had some time before we needed to have a formal headquarters somewhere. Mike lives in Central Massachusetts and I live outside of Hartford, where I grew up. My first job was downtown at The Hartford. I spent a couple of years of living downtown and then I got my graduate degree at UConn Hartford downtown and I worked for Insurity, which is also in downtown Hartford. So, I had this sense for Hartford and a real desire to set up shop here. MIKE: When we were deciding where we wanted to locate, we contemplated Boston, Worcester, and Hartford. As the non-Hartford resident, I’ve been impressed with the strong network community here. From a leadership perspective, I was impressed by the accessibility to have our voices Heard. We were able to meet with Mayor Bronin to discuss what our business would look like in Hartford. I don’t think we would have that experience if we went to Boston—and probably not in Worcester either. LUKE: When Mike and I had the conversation about where to locate, Hartford won. There were two separate trains of thought. One is, like you said, Hartford is “The Insurance Capital of The World.” This is where big insurance companies are and there’s a history of insurance operations starting and being successful here. It’s something Hartford does and there’s a certain cache to being in Hartford. Mike and I spend a lot of time working with the European market and some big London-based insurers. Hartford is very much a big part of the map for them. So, having a Hartford address was significant. The second thing is there’s also certainly a lot of talent here in Hartford. These big insurers have a lot of employees on both the business and the technology side. That makes it easy to tap into industry expertise. MIKE: We’re excited about being in the community and in the insurance scene. We see that there’s a renaissance happening in Hartford in the insurance industry. Right now, we’re actively recruiting for some more talent and we’ve been impressed with the types of resumes we’re seeing. NAN: Where do you see the benefits of becoming involved with the MetroHartford Alliance and the Hartford Chamber of Commerce? MIKE: It’s given us insight into where to find the networks we should be tied into. Admittedly, we know these networks are accessible. But our involvement with the Alliance and the Hartford Chamber provides opportunities for introductions to people from all types of industries, not just insurance. It’s been a huge help for us to leverage those networks. LUKE: With regard to the Hartford Chamber, at the end of the day, a rising tide lifts all boats. The more businesses that are successful in Hartford, the more talent comes in, the more young people come to live here. All of those things only help our proposition. So, being a member of the Chamber is an easy way to help contribute to that. Learn more about Combined Ratio Solutions www.combinedratio.com | LinkedIn 
More Posts
Share by: